Official sample reports

See what FrictionPilot reports actually show.

These samples show FrictionPilot’s stable report baseline: decision-specific crawler evidence, buyer hesitation, confidence scores, screenshot-backed findings, and practical next-step recommendations.

Run a page test →View sample reports

Evidence accepted

SaaS pricing page

The buyer can see plans, but cannot choose confidently.

Overall

Evidence

Findings

Decision

✓

Decision-specific

Each sample starts with a business type, buyer lens, and decision being tested. The report stays inside that journey instead of turning into a generic website audit.

Evidence-backed

Reports are built from accepted page evidence, screenshots, visible text, CTAs, forms, links, and decision signals. Weak raw captures stay out of the main findings.

Action-ready

Each finding explains the buyer hesitation, why it matters, suggested fix, confidence, effort, and what to retest after implementation.

Stable report baseline

Three sample reports for three real buying decisions.

These are the first report types to use as the product quality bar. They show how the same engine changes evidence, findings, and recommendations based on the selected business type, decision, and buyer lens.

The product is clear, but purchase-risk details need stronger reassurance. sample report preview

Stable baseline74/100

Ecommerce product page

The product is clear, but purchase-risk details need stronger reassurance.

Ecommerce founders, DTC teams, CRO teams, product marketers, and agencies improving product pages

Business type

Ecommerce product page

Decision tested

Buy product

Buyer lens

First-time visitor

Evidence confidence

74/100

Main friction found

Purchase risk details are not clear enough.

What the report finds

Product and price are visible, but purchase-risk details are incomplete.
The page has a buy CTA, but return, refund, warranty, and guarantee reassurance are weak or missing.
Review and testimonial evidence exists, but it does not fully remove first-time buyer doubt.
The next step after purchase is not reassuring enough for a cautious first-time visitor.

“I can understand the product and see where to buy, but I still need more reassurance before I trust the purchase.”

View sample report →View evidence

The buyer can see plans, but cannot choose confidently. sample report preview

Stable baseline79/100

SaaS pricing page

The buyer can see plans, but cannot choose confidently.

SaaS founders, product marketers, growth teams, CRO teams, and agencies improving pricing pages

Business type

SaaS / web app

Decision tested

Understand pricing and value

Buyer lens

Price-sensitive buyer

Evidence confidence

91/100

Main friction found

The buyer can see plans, but cannot choose confidently.

What the report finds

Pricing plans are visible, but the buyer has to translate them into their own use case.
Usage limits and value are not concrete enough for confident plan selection.
Budget risk and upgrade triggers need clearer examples for price-sensitive buyers.
The CTA is visible, but the page needs stronger next-step reassurance for cautious buyers.

“I can see the plans, but I still need clearer usage examples, budget guardrails, and plan-fit guidance before choosing.”

View sample report →View evidence

Implementation fit is not clear enough for an operational buyer. sample report preview

Stable baseline75/100

Enterprise implementation fit

Implementation fit is not clear enough for an operational buyer.

Enterprise software teams, product marketers, sales teams, implementation teams, and B2B agencies

Business type

Enterprise software

Decision tested

Validate implementation fit

Buyer lens

Implementation owner

Evidence confidence

82/100

Main friction found

Implementation fit is not clear enough.

What the report finds

Implementation evidence exists, but setup effort is not concrete enough for an operational buyer.
Integrations are visible, but the path from evaluation to rollout needs sharper guidance.
Security, deployment, admin controls, and ownership responsibilities are not summarized near the decision point.
The buyer may need to involve technical stakeholders before they feel confident moving forward.

“I can see this may fit our workflow, but I still need clearer setup, integration, security, and rollout details before recommending it.”

View sample report →View evidence

Report quality promise

Reports should stop when evidence is weak.

If FrictionPilot cannot capture enough reliable evidence for the selected journey, it should stop instead of producing confident-sounding but weak advice.

Capture

FrictionPilot collects page evidence before report generation.

Validate

The journey contract decides whether evidence supports the selected decision.

Report

AI writes findings only from accepted report evidence.

Deliver

Share the report, export PDF, collect stakeholder feedback, and retest.

Use this as the product promise

Test whether buyers can make the decision your page depends on.

FrictionPilot is strongest when it focuses on buyer decisions, not generic page scores. These samples should become the public proof for that positioning.

Ecommerce product page74/100 SaaS pricing page79/100 Enterprise implementation fit75/100

Run a page test See pricing

Official sample reports

See what FrictionPilot reports actually show.

Run a page test →View sample reports

Evidence accepted

SaaS pricing page

The buyer can see plans, but cannot choose confidently.

Overall

Evidence

Findings

Decision

✓

Decision-specific

Each sample starts with a business type, buyer lens, and decision being tested. The report stays inside that journey instead of turning into a generic website audit.

Evidence-backed

Reports are built from accepted page evidence, screenshots, visible text, CTAs, forms, links, and decision signals. Weak raw captures stay out of the main findings.

Action-ready

Each finding explains the buyer hesitation, why it matters, suggested fix, confidence, effort, and what to retest after implementation.

Stable report baseline

Three sample reports for three real buying decisions.

Stable baseline74/100

Ecommerce product page

The product is clear, but purchase-risk details need stronger reassurance.

Ecommerce founders, DTC teams, CRO teams, product marketers, and agencies improving product pages

Business type

Ecommerce product page

Decision tested

Buy product

Buyer lens

First-time visitor

Evidence confidence

74/100

Main friction found

Purchase risk details are not clear enough.

What the report finds

Product and price are visible, but purchase-risk details are incomplete.
The page has a buy CTA, but return, refund, warranty, and guarantee reassurance are weak or missing.
Review and testimonial evidence exists, but it does not fully remove first-time buyer doubt.
The next step after purchase is not reassuring enough for a cautious first-time visitor.

“I can understand the product and see where to buy, but I still need more reassurance before I trust the purchase.”

View sample report →View evidence

Stable baseline79/100

SaaS pricing page

The buyer can see plans, but cannot choose confidently.

SaaS founders, product marketers, growth teams, CRO teams, and agencies improving pricing pages

Business type

SaaS / web app

Decision tested

Understand pricing and value

Buyer lens

Price-sensitive buyer

Evidence confidence

91/100

Main friction found

The buyer can see plans, but cannot choose confidently.

What the report finds

Pricing plans are visible, but the buyer has to translate them into their own use case.
Usage limits and value are not concrete enough for confident plan selection.
Budget risk and upgrade triggers need clearer examples for price-sensitive buyers.
The CTA is visible, but the page needs stronger next-step reassurance for cautious buyers.

“I can see the plans, but I still need clearer usage examples, budget guardrails, and plan-fit guidance before choosing.”

View sample report →View evidence

Stable baseline75/100

Enterprise implementation fit

Implementation fit is not clear enough for an operational buyer.

Enterprise software teams, product marketers, sales teams, implementation teams, and B2B agencies

Business type

Enterprise software

Decision tested

Validate implementation fit

Buyer lens

Implementation owner

Evidence confidence

82/100

Main friction found

Implementation fit is not clear enough.

What the report finds

Implementation evidence exists, but setup effort is not concrete enough for an operational buyer.
Integrations are visible, but the path from evaluation to rollout needs sharper guidance.
Security, deployment, admin controls, and ownership responsibilities are not summarized near the decision point.
The buyer may need to involve technical stakeholders before they feel confident moving forward.

“I can see this may fit our workflow, but I still need clearer setup, integration, security, and rollout details before recommending it.”

View sample report →View evidence

Report quality promise

Reports should stop when evidence is weak.

If FrictionPilot cannot capture enough reliable evidence for the selected journey, it should stop instead of producing confident-sounding but weak advice.

Capture

FrictionPilot collects page evidence before report generation.

Validate

The journey contract decides whether evidence supports the selected decision.

Report

AI writes findings only from accepted report evidence.

Deliver

Share the report, export PDF, collect stakeholder feedback, and retest.

Use this as the product promise

Test whether buyers can make the decision your page depends on.

FrictionPilot is strongest when it focuses on buyer decisions, not generic page scores. These samples should become the public proof for that positioning.

Ecommerce product page74/100 SaaS pricing page79/100 Enterprise implementation fit75/100

Run a page test See pricing